Trademark Law and Branding in the Music Industry

By Abraham V Daniel & Alyson D’Silva

I. Introduction

Trademark and brand names are essential, serving as a key source of identity for any organization. In the current music industry, musicians and groups have transformed into brands. If artists were unable to create their work, the music industry as we understand it, would probably come to an end.

II. Trademark law

The purpose of trademark laws is to safeguard names, symbols, and phrases—collectively referred to as trademarks—that serve to identify and differentiate the origin of goods or services. Developing a distinctive identity is becoming more crucial as the digital sphere links artists and bands with fans across the world via sites like YouTube and Spotify. In addition to other visual components and any narrative, website, or original written content produced by the artist, trademark laws also protect a distinctive name for a specific good or service. By making sure that the origin of goods or services is easily identifiable, trademark law serves the main goal of preventing consumer misunderstandings. The fundamental tenet of trademark law is that a mark serves as a public indicator of a product or service’s origin. It is undoubtedly a law that highlights the place of origin of goods and services in order to protect consumers. In terms of the music industry, it represents a diverse and intricate field where originality and creativity are essential. To keep their competitive edge and make sure that their creations are not misappropriated or misrepresented, artists, producers, and other industry professionals must protect their intellectual property (“IP”). Since it creates an artist's or band's identity and brand, trademark law is essential to preserving this protection and is significant in the music industry. A well-known brand can influence customer loyalty and choices by standing for fashion and quality. The Rolling Stones’ tongue logo is instantly identifiable and connected to the band's persona and sound.

Commercial use and the ensuing development of “secondary meaning”—the public’s recognition and association of the mark with the source of goods or services—create trademark and service mark rights in the United States. An artist does not need to formally register their name in order to assert their rights or seek trademark protection because rights depend on usage. Simply put, the artist must be the first to consistently use the name in business for the specific goods and services associated with that name.

III. Trademark Registration in the Music Industry

Trademark registration offers legal safeguards and exclusive rights for commercial use of the mark. It is important to seek protection for their artist or band name as soon as possible. While the cost may appear to be too much, the potential adverse effects of no search or registration can be much more detrimental and costly. Since a musician’s personal identity is connected with his name, including social media sites, websites, and merchandise, it is prudent to conduct a trademark screening search prior to opening and developing these platforms to identify any potential roadblocks to your name and determine if your name is available. This will ensure that you are not infringing on someone else’s registered or protected trademark. 

IV. Benefits of a Trademark Registration

Creating a solid brand image is tremendously critical for musicians and artists in the music industry. Having a unique band name, logo, and other branding materials can differentiate you in a crowded marketplace and leave a lasting impression on your fan base. Trademarking your trademark makes you the sole owner of such brand attributes and does not cause confusion to customers, so your distinct identity is not ruined and manipulated or disrespected by others. Choosing attributes that are distinctive, easily remembered, and are effective in separating your music from your rivals is most important. Perform detailed research to make sure that your suggested brand elements do not closely resemble other trademarks so as to avoid possible future conflicts and court cases. With your brand identity designed, the next step is applying for your trademark with the relevant government department. The procedure includes filing an application, including a thorough description of your trademark, and establishing its use in trade. Obtaining a registered trademark enables you to establish legal precedent, deter potential infringers, and enhance your ability to assert your rights against unauthorized use of your brand property. Preventing customer confusion and protecting your reputation are critical benefits of trademark registration. When your brand is distinct and connected to your music, it aids in fostering trust and loyalty among your audience.

V. The Value of a Trademark Registration

1)A trademark is not just a measure of legal protection; it is also an important asset. Musicians are able to make money from their trademarks through licensing agreements, allowing others to use their brand for merchandise, collaborations, or sponsorship. This adds additional revenue streams outside of music sales and live performances, boosting a more diversified financial portfolio.

2)A registered trademark makes a musician’s presence felt in the market, signifying professionalism and establishing the brand as a viable and recognised player in the market. Such greater exposure can attract greater opportunities, ranging from record deals to sponsorship deals, and can increase the fan base as the brand becomes more visible and credible.

3)In the contemporary interconnected world, music surpasses geographical limits. Internationally extending trademark registration safeguards your brand across various nations. This worldwide acknowledgment is essential for artists aiming to broaden their reach and impact globally. 

VI. Branding

Traditionally, music artists in the music industry basically relied on revenue from their produced albums and live performances. However, the terrain of the music industry has changed in recent years. With more musicians in the industry relying on additional revenue streams rather than album sales alone, they must find ways to generate additional income and can use their names and logos to do so. Artists not only want higher incomes but also greater consumer recognition, which they can gain through non-record enterprises such as as merchandising or third-party endorsement. Artists are now using their names and logos to stand for something greater than music. The musical artist has, therefore, become a “brand”. Parties outside of the music world, including record labels and advertisers, also want to be part of the brand. In the ever-evolving music world, building a strong brand name is pivotal for musicians and music professionals to standout amidst the crowded market. A well-conceived brand not only resonates with the target audience but also protects the intellectual property of the artist. The following guide analyses the crucial role of copyright law in creating and maintaining a robust brand identity. 

A. Branding

Traditionally, music artists in the music industry basically relied on revenue from their produced albums and live performances. However, the terrain of the music industry has changed in recent years. With more musicians in the industry relying on additional revenue streams rather than album sales alone, they must find ways to generate additional income and can use their names and logos to do so. Artists not only want higher incomes but also greater consumer recognition, which they can gain through non-record enterprises such as as merchandising or third-party endorsement. Artists are now using their names and logos to stand for something greater than music. The musical artist has, therefore, become a “brand”. Parties outside of the music world, including record labels and advertisers, also want to be part of the brand. In the ever-evolving music world, building a strong brand name is pivotal for musicians and music professionals to standout amidst the crowded market. A well-conceived brand not only resonates with the target audience but also protects the intellectual property of the artist. The following guide analyses the crucial role of copyright law in creating and maintaining a robust brand identity.

B. Establishing a Protectable Brand Identity

An effective brand is more than an enticing name. It’s a collage of aspects: the recognisable logo on a t-shirt, the unified visual style of album covers, an individualistic stage presence, or even a distinct sound that can be identified immediately. Although these are artistic decisions, their financial worth lies ultimately in trademark law. It is trademark law that converts a name or a symbol from being simply a descriptor into a legally protectable, and thus monetizable, property, apart from the copyright that safeguards the musical compositions themselves.

From a legal perspective, not all names are equal. The validity of a trademark, and how well it can be defended, tends to rely on its distinctiveness. Fanciful names (invented words) or arbitrary names (ordinary words used for an unrelated service) are the most potent. Suggestive marks, which subtly suggest a quality without specifically describing it, also work. Descriptive names, which are hard to protect unless it can be shown that they have developed a “secondary meaning” in the public’s minds, are on the weaker side. Selecting a distinctive and uncommon name from the very beginning is the initial strategic move in creating a brand that can be successfully defended.

Prior to an artist investing significantly in a name, developing a social media following, printing merchandise, and marketing it to a consumer base, one initial step is most important: a complete trademark search. The process assists in establishing whether the name or logo suggested has already been utilized by another in a related area. Stepping into a profession with a name that is already someone else’s artist name is a recipe for disaster, which can result in costly rebranding or, worse still, an infringement legal tussle. To do this due to diligence ahead of time is a core activity of professional brand management that lays the groundwork for everything else.

II. Facing the Music

Infringement and Disputes in India having a trademark is one thing; defending it is another battle entirely. In India, the Trademarks Act, 1999, is the primary legislation that governs these rights. Trademark infringement under this Act happens when someone uses a mark that is “deceptively similar” to a registered trademark, causing likely confusion for the public.  Imagine a new indie band from Mumbai starts using the name “Indian Oceans”, releasing music in a similar genre to the legendary Delhi-based band, “Indian Ocean”. Fans could easily get confused, thinking the new band is affiliated with the original. Indian courts would look at factors like the similarity in name and sound, the nature of the music (“the goods”), the audience they target, and whether any actual confusion has happened. 

This leaves us with a question that has dissolved more bands than creative conflicts ever did: who owns the name? When a band member quits or the band breaks up, pandemonium results. Lacking an agreement, Indian law, often assisted by the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, would probably consider the band’s name a common asset of the original members. This prevents anyone from walking off with the name. To prevent messy, high-profile legal battles, it is completely crucial for bands, from the outset, to enter into a partnership agreement. This should set down clearly what happens to the band’s name and other intellectual property in the event of a change of line-up, so there is a professional route map to cover any eventuality. 

Safeguarding a renowned brand by dilution for renowned musicians whose names are household names consider A.R. Rahman or Lata Mangeshkar, Indian law provides a more robust protection: the principle of trademark dilution. This special protection, contained in Section 29(4) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, comes in even when there is no direct consumer confusion. Dilution is concerned with preserving the strength and prestige of an extremely famous mark from getting diluted or tarnished. 

There are two ways a famous mark can be diluted. The first is “blurring”, where the uniqueness of a famous name is chipped away. For example, if someone launched a brand of “A.R. Rahman” mobile phones, it could dilute the singular association of that name with musical genius. The second is “tarnishment”, which is even more damaging. This happens when a famous mark is linked to something of poor quality or is used in a sleazy context. Imagine a cheap tobacco company using a logo that mimics the signature style of a beloved classical musician; this would tarnish the artist’s esteemed reputation. This powerful legal tool is reserved for brands that have earned a significant reputation across India, giving them an extra layer of defence against misuse.

VIII. The Digital Frontier

Trademarks in Modern India, today’s music battles are fought as much online as they are on stage. An artist’s brand lives on Instagram handles, YouTube channels, and website domains. A major threat here is cybersquatting—the bad-faith practice of registering a domain name linked to a popular brand to extort money. While India lacks a specific law like the US ACPA, this issue is tackled effectively through the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the IN Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (INDRP). Indian courts have consistently sided with trademark owners in such cases, reinforcing that brand rights extend to the digital world. Aspiring artists should treat securing their social media handles and domain names with the same urgency as registering their trademark. 

The latest frontier is Web3, with NFTs and the metaverse opening new doors. Indian celebrities and artists are already exploring this space, selling digital art and exclusive content as NFTs. This also opens the door for infringement. If someone were to mint and sell NFTs of a famous singer's album art without their permission, it would likely be considered a trademark infringement. Indian law is adaptable, and the core principle of preventing unauthorised commercial use of a brand identity would apply, ensuring that an artist's rights follow them into these new virtual economies. 

IX. Taking the Show on the Road: Global Brand Protection 

For any Indian artist who aspires to global fame, their brand protection must not be confined at the borders of the country. Trademark rights are territorial; registration with the Indian Trade Marks Registry will only protect you in India, but not in the UK, USA, or Japan. Preparing for global protection is necessary.

Fortunately, that is no longer a logistical nightmare. India became a member of the Madrid Protocol since 2013, an international system which is a game-changer for creatives. An Indian band is able to file one international application, in English, through the Indian Trade Marks Registry, and specify any of the 130+ member states where it desires protection. Though it does not establish a single “world trademark”, it simplifies and centralises a great deal the process of establishing an international brand. It enables Indian artists to be able to ensure that while their music travels across oceans, their brand identity is safe, enabling them to establish a worldwide fanbase on a strong legal footing. 

X. Conclusion

The journey from that very first song you crafted to a name that people know is a long and arduous one. It’s a road of late-night rehearsals, low-budget shows, and an awful lot of passion. All that hard work does more than build a body of music; it builds a brand, a persona that is distinctly yours.

And as we’ve observed, that brand requires a caretaker. These days, your reputation is under attack from every quarter—from imitators and cybersquatters to even intra-band disputes. The Indian legal system provides you with the tools to be that caretaker. It enables you to draw a line in the sand, to firmly plant your flag in virtual space and around the world, so that the name you built up with so much effort remains yours.

Finally, consider a trademark not as a mind-numbing legal hassle, but as the last, vital piece of the puzzle. It’s an act of standing behind yourself. You trusted in your music enough to make it; a trademark is the statement that you trust it enough to stand behind it for the long term.

References:

1.S.S Rana and Co., Trademarks in India, SS RANA & CO. (last visited July 15, 2025).

2.Katzarov, Trademark Registration in the Music Industry, KATZAROV (last visited July 15 , 2025).

3.Sarah Lee, Trademark Law Essentials in the Music Industry, NUMBER ANALYTICS (last visited July 15, 2025).

5.Justin M. Jacobson, Trademark Law: A Musician's Basic Guide to Trademark Law, JMJESQ.COM (last visited July 20, 2025).

7.Intellectual Property Today, How the Band Protects its Brand: The Use of Trademarks to Protect and Promote the Musical Artist, I. P. Today, 381 W. Northwest Hwy., Palatine, IL 60067, Volume 14, No.4 (April 2007).

8.Score Detect, Trademark vs Copyright for Music Musical Performances, SCOREDETECT (last visited July 15, 2025).

10. Bhuvaneswari S, The Legal Beat: Navigating Trademarks in Music, II L.F. INT'L J. DOCTRINAL LEGAL RSCH. 437 (2024).

12. The Trade Marks Act, 1999, Section 29,No. 47, Acts of Parliament, 1999 (India).

13. Parle Products (P) Ltd. v. J.P. & Co., A.I.R. 1972 S.C. 1359 (India).

14. The Indian Partnership Act, 1932, No. 9, Acts of Parliament, 1932 (India).

15. Ameet Datta & Archana Shankar, Who owns the brand? Disputes over band names, INDIA BUS. L.J. (Mar. 26, 2021).

16. The Trade Marks Act, 1999, No. 47, Acts of Parliament, 1999 (India).

17. ITC Ltd. v. Philip Morris Products SA, (2010) 42 P.T.C. 572 (Del.) (India).

18. Yahoo Inc. v. Akash Arora, (1999) 19 P.T.C. 201 (Del.) (India).

19. Shraboni G, NFTs and Intellectual Property Rights in India, MONDAQ (Apr. 22, 2022).

20. Press Information Bureau, India Joins Madrid Protocol for International Registration of Trade Marks, GOV’T OF INDIA (July 8, 2013).

21. World Intellectual Property Organization, The Madrid System, WIPO (last visited July 16, 2025).